Media
outlets choke on Heimlich obituaries
by Erik Wemple, Washington Post,
January 31, 2017:
(Peter Heimlich obtained) at least seven
corrections/amendments (to published
obituaries about his father) from some
of the biggest names in the news
business, over a single news topic.
Record?
...On Jan. 9, (Heimlich) emailed the
newspaper with correction requests over
the Berry thing as well as a contention
regarding the Journal of the
American Medical Association (JAMA). The
New York Times later informed him that
it wouldn’t be responding.
That’s when Peter Heimlich turned to the
Erik Wemple Blog, a bastion of
accountability in relation to medical
history. He CC’d us in an appeal to
Spayd that included this elbow:
“Needless to say, for the paper of
record not to correct factual errors is
a slippery and troubling slope...." We
have asked (Public Editor Liz) Spayd for
a further explanation; she referred us
to (senior standards editor Greg) Brock;
Brock says that a correction is in the
works.
Via
the New York Times:
Who Saved Otto Klug?
Investigating a 75-year-old mystery
by Peter M. Heimlich, Kent Historical
Society Newsletter, February 2017.
According to two 1941 articles in the
New York Times and my father's 2014
memoir, he saved the life of a man
named Otto Klug in a massive,
high-profile train wreck in Litchfield
County, Connecticut. But all local
newspaper reports credit an local man
named Jack Bartovic for saving Klug.
Was this my father's first media scam?
N.J.
school agency's implosion leaves
questions, South Jersey
Times Editorial Board, March 17, 2017:
Wonder where your kid's teachers go when
his or her school district has
"in-service days" when staff is supposed
to work, but students have no classes?
If it's not to the mall, the casino or
on a journey of spiritual improvement,
chances are that, in New Jersey,
they're at a program given or
authorized by the Educational
Information & Resource Center
(EIRC). EIRC, once one of several
similar agencies around the state,
supplies curriculum development tools
and serves as a clearinghouse for
anti-bullying, tolerance and other
programs.
Now, EIRC is going away after losing a
staggering $3.7 million in the past
three years. That's on an annual budget
no larger than $18 million over the
period. Incredible.
...EIRC's
website was operating a few
days ago, but went off-line about the
time the Times' first report about
the monetary troubles appeared. Also,
the agency was involved in a recent Open
Public Records Act tussle that
played out at the shore. According to
the
Cape May Herald, ERIC had a judge
block an OPRA request from a
Georgia-based "investigative blogger."
The judge ruled that agencies didn't
have to supply records
when requests came from outside New
Jersey. Fortunately, Superior Court
Assignment Judge Georgia Cuiro reversed
the decision, and rejected an EIRC
motion to reconsider it.
We have no clue why Peter Heimlich of
Atlanta sought EIRC records, but the
agency took considerable steps to keep
them secret. Some follow-up is in order.
Let's find out if this is another
textbook case -- pun intended -- of a
New Jersey independent agency operating
with insufficient internal or external
controls.
Son
of famed New Rochelle doctor asks
for Walk of Fame reconsideration
by Lisa Reyes, Local12 (Westchester,
NY), May 8, 2017 -- click
here for a copy my
letter:
The son of a New Rochelle doctor
credited with creating the Heimlich
maneuver says inducting his father into
the New Rochelle Walk of Fame would be a
mistake.
Dr. Henry Heimlich, part of the New
Rochelle High School class of 1937, is
world-famous for developing the
anti-choking method that bears his name.
This year, the city is honoring him by
inducting him into its Walk of Fame.
Dr. Heimlich's son, Peter, sent a letter
to the city urging officials to
reconsider the designation.
"My father was involved most of his
career promoting a bunch of crackpot
medical ideas that resulted in a
significant loss of life," he says.
The
surprising reason why the Heimlich
maneuver is no longer called 'the
Heimlich' by Gene Kim and
Jessica Orwig, Business Insider, June
6, 2017
What's the right way to
save a choking victim's life? It
turns out, the Heimlich maneuver is not
the only approach – and it may not even
be the best one.
Repeated blows to the back could be
equally useful in a dangerous situation.
You might be thinking that back blows
will only lodge the food deeper into a
person's trachea. But this is a myth
perpetuated by Dr. Henry Heimlich.
According to reports from Dr. Heimlich's
youngest son, Peter Heimlich, the
founder of the Heimlich maneuver spent
years trying to discredit back blows,
publicly denouncing them as "death
blows."
He even funded a study in the '80s that
showed back blows could do more harm to
a choking victim than good. But in
truth, there is no valid scientific
evidence to prove that back blows are
any better, or worse, than the Heimlich
maneuver.
Media
player column by John
Burns, The Sunday Times (UK), June 18
2017 (free signup for two
articles/month):
(Peter Heimlich), a 63-year-old retired
businessman living in Atlanta, thinks
his father was a humbug who lied to
journalists and saw many of his
preposterous claims printed verbatim.
“As a result,” Peter Heimlich says,
“when he died last December, virtually
all of his obituaries included factual
errors.” So he set about having them
corrected. Within a month he had secured
published corrections in seven news
outlets, including The Washington Post,
The New York Times and The Wall Street
Journal. “Since then, that tally has
more than doubled,” he says.
The Sunday Independent published an
obituary of Heimlich on December 25.
Unbylined, it was “riddled” with errors,
according to Peter. He emailed the Sindo
a number of times, but received only
auto-replies. In mid-January this year,
he contacted the Office of the Press
Ombudsman, and got a same-day response
supplying the contact details of INM’s
group managing editor. He explained to
Heimlich that the Sindo obituary had
come from The Daily Telegraph, with
which it has a syndication agreement.
...Heimlich then turned his sights on to
the Telegraph, and within days it had
posted online a revised version of the
obituary, correcting seven errors.
Heimlich emailed this to the INM editor,
and by February 8 the original Sindo
obit had been replaced with the revised
and corrected one.
But the saga was not over; now the
headline was wrong...Further emails to
the Indo went unanswered, however, so
once more he turned to the Office of the
Press Ombudsman. Again, bingo! The
headline on the Indo’s website was
promptly fixed.
...(A) decade ago, Peter Heimlich would
have got no satisfaction. Back then,
Irish newspapers were bad at admitting
and correcting errors...What changed?
The industry’s own decision to appoint
and fund a press ombudsman...Newspapers
do not like having to deal with formal
complaints lodged by the public with the
ombudsman, and loathe having to publish
negative decisions....
“The public deserves an effective
independent press oversight organisation
like the Office of the Press Ombudsman,”
Peter Heimlich concludes. “It’s
unfortunate we don’t have one here in
the US, but perhaps some days we’ll
catch up with Ireland.”
Duncan
Garner saves son from choking on
bacon by Newshub staff,
June 12, 2017, Newshub New Zealand:
Duncan Garner has recounted the
"dreadful experience" of his young son
choking on food and not knowing how to
save him.
The AM Show host said both he and
six-year-old son Buster knew how bad
things could have got after the boy ate
a piece of bacon without first cutting
it.
...Newshub was sent an email by the son
of Henry Heimlich, who invented the
technique, saying his dad's manoeuvre
wasn't the right way to help someone who
is choking.
"First of all would you please convey to
Mr Garner that I'm delighted that he and
his lad got the better of that bacon?
"Second, Mr Garner may wish to learn
that my father's
namesake anti-choking treatment
("the Heimlich" aka abdominal thrusts)
is not recommended by the New
Zealand Resuscitation Council or by St
John Ambulance New Zealand," he
wrote.
Instead, chest thrusts are now the
recommended method and more effective
than abdominal thrusts.
Methods
to save choking victims
by Fred Cicetti, September 1, 2017,
International Falls (MN) Journal:
A few months ago, I wrote a
column on the Heimlich maneuver, a
well-known method to save choking
victims. After the column appeared, I
received an email from Peter Heimlich,
the son of the late Henry Heimlich,
who invented the procedure.
Peter Heimlich said that two of the
methods recommended by the Heimlich
Institute — the source for my column —
are “problematic.” These are the
methods for treating unconscious
victims and infants. He recommended
that I contact the American Heart
Association and the American Red Cross
and ask them for their guidelines. I
felt obliged to follow-up on my
column.
Yale
researcher’s ratings service
discontinued by Amy
Xiong, Yale Daily News, November 3,
2017:
NuVal LLC, a nutrition ratings service
criticized for its potential conflicts
of interest — and established by
Director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention
Research Center David Katz SPH ’93 — has
been discontinued nationally.
The NuVal Nutritional Scoring System is
currently being removed from grocery
shelves, according to a USA Today
article published on Oct. 25. Created in
2008, the NuVal system works by
assigning a score from 1–100 based on
the nutritional characteristics of any
given food. Katz is now founding a new
company called DQPN — which stands for
Diet Quality Photo Navigation — to
evaluate dietary nutrition.
“NuVal was criticized for giving high
ratings to sugary foods. That may have
just been a coincidence, or it may have
had to do with who funds Katz,” said
science journalist and longtime Katz
critic Nina Teicholz ’87, who has
written about the food industry’s
influence on nutrition science. “It’s a
murky area.”
Mail
Online and Evening Standard pull
'completely untrue' stories about Ed
Byrne saving audience member's life
with Heimlich manoeuvre
by John
Reynolds, Press Gazette (UK), January 4,
2017:
The Mail Online and London
Evening Standard have pulled stories
claiming that comedian Ed Byrne
performed a life-saving manoeuvre on an
audience member, after the stories were
refuted by the comedian and the theatre
where it was purported to take place.
It was reported in Mail
Online and on the London Evening
Standard website that after seeing a
member of the audience in anguish
while choking on food, the comedian
jumped from the stage and performed
the Heimlich manoeuvre during his
set.
A spokesman for the Alhambra
theatre in Bradford, said it had “no
record” that anything like this
occurred at Byrne’s show on 9
December,2017.
Byrne also said the story
was untrue. He tweeted: “This is a
great story, only partially ruined by
the fact that’s it’s completely
untrue.”
...Blogger
Peter Heimlich exposed the two titles
pulling the story.
On his blog – The Sidebar –
he explains that his father is the
doctor credited with inventing the
famous life-saving technique.
Life-saving
Byrne is a choke at media’s expense
by John Burns, Sunday Times of Ireland,
January 7,
2018:
Heard the one about the
Irish comedian who saved the life of an
audience member by performing the
Heimlich manoeuvre?
The Daily Mail and Evening
Standard reported last week that Ed
Byrne saw a woman choking during a
performance in December, jumped from the
stage mid-joke, and saved her.
Byrne
says it is a great story but only
wishes it were true.
They
quoted Morgan Wilson, 29, as saying: “I
was laughing too much while I was eating
M&Ms during his hysterical act, and
looking back it wasn’t the best idea for
a comedy gig as I started choking. If it
weren’t for Ed, I believe I would have
choked to death. I’m still in disbelief
that he saved me.”
Not as much disbelief as
Byrne was in when he heard about the
claim. “This is a great story, only
partially ruined by the fact that it’s
completely untrue,” the Dubliner
tweeted. The “fake news” pieces promptly
disappeared from the Mail and Standard
websites.
A news editor on the Irish
Sun revealed this was a deliberate
attempt to hoax newspapers. Told by the
Sun that Byrne was denying the story,
the woman replied: “He’s probably being
modest.”
Comedian
didn’t save choking fan, 2 UK sites
delete stories by Sydney Smith,
IMediaEthics, January 10, 2018:
Blogger Peter Heimlich,
whose father is the same Dr. Henry J.
Heimlich associated with the
aforementioned maneuver, has caches
and screenshots of the errors on his website.
In an e-mail to iMediaEthics,
Heimlich, who noted he has raised
questions about previous reports on
people allegedly being saved by the
Heimlich maneuver, explained he
spotted the Mail Online
article and then tweeted Byrne to ask
for more information. The next day, he
noticed the article had been removed
and kept digging.
Byrne tweeted about the
Evening Standard‘s story,
“This is a great story, only partially
ruined by the fact that it’s
completely untrue.” A
spokesperson for the theatre, Liz
Hall, told iMediaEthics, “We have no
record that anything like this
occurred” and pointed to Byrne’s
tweet.
iMediaEthics has
contacted both the Standard
and Mail to ask how they
learned about the story, how they
attempted to fact check and if they
are or have published corrections.
Not
choking fan (Interview with Peter
by Carol Off), As It Happens, Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation, January
10, 2018:
CO: What was it about
the articles that rang alarm bells in
your head?
PH: Well, I didn't initially
have an alarm bell. What concerned me
about the reporting, and I didn't know
if the stories were bogus or whether
it was just reported not at the
highest level of journalism. The first
story, which was published on January
2nd; that was a Tuesday, appears to
have originated solely from one
source. A woman who was identified as
Morgan Wilson, and the photo
identified her as Morgan Wilson. As I
don't need to tell you, Carol, a basic
rule of journalism is to confirm facts
with two or more sources. But the Mail
article didn't quote anyone else.
Nothing from Ed Byrne, the comic and
alleged rescuer, or from
representatives of the theatre where
the incident reportedly occurred, or
from any medical personnel who were
reportedly on the scene, and there
were no eyewitnesses who were quoted
in the story.
Heimlich’s
son questions Dechoker products in
A-L schools by Kate Day
Sager, Olean (NY) Times Herald,
November 1, 2018:
The
son of the founder of the Heimlich
maneuver has questioned the
effectiveness and safety of the
Dechoker device currently available at
a local school district and other
public locations in the area.
But Peter Heimlich,
son of Dr. Henry Heimlich, who in
1974 was credited with developing
the abdominal thrust meant to clear
a person’s airway from an object
causing choking, questions the
Dechoker’s effectiveness and safety,
stating it hasn’t been tested.
..“Why the
school district and the sheriff's
office thought this was a good idea is
a mystery,” Heimlich said in an email
to the Times Herald. “There are no
research studies published in
peer-reviewed medical journals testing
the device's effectiveness and safety
— let alone on children — and it isn't
recommended by any first aid
organizations.”
Heimlich said that
one doesn’t “have to be an expert to
realize that using an unproven,
unapproved medical device in what
may be a life or death emergency
raises serious questions. For
example, were parents of students
given the opportunity to provide
informed consent for the use of the
device on their kids? Was a risk
manager consulted to evaluate
potential liability concerns?”
As for the abdominal
thrusts, Heimlich said that
procedure has been the topic of a
“spirited debate” in the medical
community about how best to respond
to a choking emergency.
“For example, some
experts have suggested that chest
thrusts are safer and more effective
than the Heimlich maneuver,” he
said. “In fact, first aid
authorities in Australia and New
Zealand recommend chest thrusts, not
‘the Heimlich.’ Are they ahead of
the curve? I don't know, but that's
one of the beauties of science — it
keeps evolving.”
Blogger
asks press regulator to consider
sanctions against online
publishers that pull articles
without explanation by staff
reporter Charlotte Tobitt, Press
Gazette (UK), February 11, 2019:
A US
blogger is pushing for a change to
the Editors’ Code of Practice – the
standards to which most UK
newspapers are held – which would
see publications sanctioned for
pulling articles without
explanation.
Peter Heimlich has
asked the Editors’ Code of Practice
Committee to consider “plugging” a
hole in the code which allows
publishers to delete online news
articles “with impunity.”
...Heimlich
told Press Gazette: “’Here today,
gone tomorrow’ reporting is not only
junk journalism, it’s a thumb in the
eye to readers: ‘If we get something
wrong, we’ll just bury it and you
don’t deserve an explanation.’"
...In a letter to Code
Committee secretary Jonathan Grun,
Heimlich wrote: “For instance, if an
article includes false information,
rather than exercising editorial
responsibility to correct errors, a
publication may simply eliminate the
entire story.
“That may shield
reporters and editors from
embarrassment (or worse), but in my
opinion the Orwellian ‘disappearing’
of published news reports is a
disservice to readers and to the
record.
“It’s also a slippery
ethical slope. For example, if an
advertiser doesn’t like critical
information in a story, could a word
in the ear of a person with
authority at the newspaper lead to
the offending article being sent
down the memory hole?”
An
AIDS therapy involving parasite
injections was discredited.
China is reviving it — for
cancer by Jane Qiu, Stat
news, March 18, 2019
American
surgeon Henry
Heimlich is best known for
inventing a way to rescue choking
victims, but a quarter-century ago,
he was vilified for promoting a
fringe treatment for AIDS and Lyme
disease. Called malarial therapy, it
involved injecting patients with the
malaria-causing parasite, supposedly
to stimulate their immune systems.
The
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention issued a report saying
the procedure “cannot
be justified,” and another
critic compared its use to the
discredited practice of bleeding
patients with leeches. Despite the
criticism, Heimlich launched trials
of the therapy in HIV patients in
Mexico and China in the 1990s. Now,
the scientist who led the Chinese
study is using malarial therapy
again — this time to treat cancer
patients. And the still-unproven
intervention is being hailed in
China as a miracle cure.
Spotlight:
Experts warn malaria for cancer
treatment "scientifically
unsound," risky for patients
by Tan Jingjing,
Xinhua News, March 18, 2018
In an exclusive
interview with Xinhua, Peter
Heimlich, son of Henry J. Heimlich,
said his father claimed he could
cure cancer by infecting patients
with malaria in the early 1980s.
In the late 1980s,
the Heimlich Institute conducted
clandestine experiments in Mexico
which were eventually shut down by
the Mexican government.
The Heimlich
Institute also oversaw experiments
on U.S. Lyme Disease patients in
Mexico City and Panama City, before
the project was shut down in 1992
after an investigation by the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) because returning
patients infected with malaria were
bringing the disease into the United
States, according to Peter Heimlich.
Henry Heimlich's
"malariotherapy" raised great
controversy. Many U.S. medical
experts said the theory does not
make any scientific sense.
In a phone interview
with Xinhua, Robert S. Baratz,
assistant clinical professor of
medicine at Boston University School
of Medicine, said that what the
Chinese research team has been
working on is no different from
Henry Heimlich's "malariotherapy"
experiments.
"It (the therapy) has
no logic nor scientific basis," said
Baratz, who was former executive
director of the U.S. National
Council Against Health Fraud, adding
Henry Heimlich had no background or
training in immunology.
"Dr. Heimlich was no
expert in malaria, HIV, Lyme, nor
infectious diseases," he said.
"In my own opinion,
the 'malariatherapy' endorsed by Dr.
Heimlich has no scientific basis and
should not be used on human
subjects," said George J. Annas, a
professor and director of the Center
for Health Law, Ethics and Human
Rights at the Boston University
School of Public Health, School of
Medicine, and School of Law.
Dr.
Heimlich’s son questions
effectiveness of
famed maneuver by Jeff
Bernthal, FOX2 Now (St.
Louis), April 29, 2019:
Dr. Heimlich’s own son
believes there could be more effective
means of helping choking victims.
Peter Heimlich said his father was a
very effective promoter and believes
that played a big role in convincing
the public his method was the best way
to help choking victims.
“He was such a gifted
marketer he could teach P.T. Barnum
a few tricks,” said Peter Heimlich.
Dr. Anthony Pearson,
a cardiologist at St. Luke’s
Hospital, believes the abdominal
thrust method of helping choking
victims should be called the
Heimlich experiment instead of the
Heimlich maneuver.
“It seems to help
some people but we don’t know how
many are helped or how many would
have been improved if they had just
gotten back slaps,” he said. “That’s
why I call it an experiment."
Pearson said Heimlich
tried to discredit those who
attempted to promote other methods
such as back slaps or chest thrusts.
“He really bullied
people to not think of anything
other than his abdominal thrusts
procedure which became known as the
Heimlich maneuver," he said.
Peter Heimlich and
his wife have even created
a website that includes links to
media reports questioning his
father’s work.
“The debate which
began when my dad first introduced
the treatment in 1974 and has
continued until now is whether it’s
the most effective and safest
treatment,” said Peter Heimlich.
The Australia and New
Zealand Committee on Resuscitation
removed abdominal thrusts from its
guidelines in 2010 after the agency
discovered there were 32 case
reports of abdominal thrusts causing
life-threatening harm. The agency
determined higher airway pressures
could be generated by using chest
thrusts rather than abdominal
thrusts.
“There has to be a
better way to go about doing
something that’s looking at trying
to prevent 4,000 deaths a year,”
Pearson said.
He said there’s no
doubt the Heimlich has saved lives.
The question remains what’s the
balance between the life’s saved and
the potential for serious, even
deadly harm, according to Pearson.
Dr.
Heimlich’s son questions whether
famous anti-choking maneuver is
the best or safest treatment
by Danielle Wallace, FOX News,
updated May 14,
2019:
The American Red Cross began adopting
Heimlich’s abdominal thrust maneuver
in 1976. in 2005, the ARC "downgraded"
abdominal thrusts (aka the Heimlich
maneuver) to a secondary treatment
response for choking emergencies.
Since then, the ARC's recommended
first treatment response has been a
series of back blows. Here's an ARC
poster describing the protocol which
they call "the five and five."
The AHA recommends to first try using
abdominal thrusts on conscious
responsive adults and children aged 1
or older to dislodge a foreign-body
airway obstruction (FBAO). “If
abdominal thrusts are not effective,
the rescuer may consider chest
thrusts,” the website states.
...The
Australia and New Zealand Committee on
Resuscitation removed abdominal
thrusts from its guidelines in 2010,
citing 32 case reports of abdominal
thrusts causing life-threatening harm,
FOX 2 reported. The agency concluded
higher airway pressures could be
generated by using chest thrusts
rather than abdominal thrusts.
Top
editors reject call to penalise
IPSO-regulated publishers for
deleting stories without
explanation by Charlotte Tobitt,
Press Gazette, May 30, 2019:
Top editors have
rejected a request to change the
Editors’ Code of Practice – the
standards to which most UK news titles
are held – so that publications could
be sanctioned for pulling articles
without explanation.
US blogger Peter Heimlich asked the
Editors’ Code of Practice Committee in
January to consider “plugging” a hole
in the code which allows publishers to
delete online news articles “with
impunity”.
Heimlich made the suggestion to the
Independent Press Standards
Organisation after complaining that
three articles published by its
members over the 12 months from
January 2018, which he said had
contained problems or inaccuracies,
were deleted with no explanation.
...Heimlich told Press Gazette:
“Obviously the committee’s decision
puts the authority of editors above
the public’s right to know. Plus it
provides a perverse incentive to
‘disappear’ entire articles rather
than to publish corrections (which
have to be acknowledged).
“But the decision also leaves open the
door to countless opportunities for
misconduct.
“You’re an embarrassed editor because
a reporter got a story wrong? Just hit
the ‘delete’ key. You’re a big
advertiser in a newspaper that runs a
story you don’t like? Tell your sales
rep that you’re pulling your account
and watch the article disappear.
You’re a powerful politician and a
local paper runs a critical story
about you? A quick call to an editor
could send it ‘down the memory hole’
and none the wiser.”
State
Rep. Jim Marshall’s infant choking
bill to be amended to avoid
teaching Heimlich procedure for
use on babies by J.D. Prose,
Beaver County (PA) Times, June 17,
2019
State Rep. Jim
Marshall’s recent bill on infant CPR
and choking prevention will need to
be amended in the Senate after he
learned that the well-known Heimlich
maneuver is not recommended for
babies.
...(Peter Heimlich), the
son of the late Dr. Henry Heimlich,
who popularized the anti-choking
method that involves standing behind
a choking victim and giving them
abdominal thrusts with interlocked
arms, saw a story about the bill
online and spotted a problem.
In subsequent emails,
Heimlich, who lives in Georgia, said
his father’s namesake technique is
not recommended for infants.
Heimlich said medical groups, such
as the American Red Cross,
advise against using the procedure
on infants.
“What concerns me is
that codifying that language in a
government statute may inadvertently
result in harm to infants,” Heimlich
wrote in an email.
Heimlich has also
written a letter to state Secretary
of Education Pedro Rivera and
University of Pennsylvania President
Amy Gutmann about concerns he has
over the Heimlich Heroes program and
its Heimlich choking procedures on
babies being taught to Philadelphia
students through a Penn Medicine
grant.
In
Arizona, a County Attorney
Candidate’s Past Seems To
Contradict Her Pro-Reform
Stance: Julie Gunnigle, who is
running in Maricopa County,
says she supports alternatives
to incarceration. But a decade
ago in Illinois, she
prosecuted a woman for
recording phone calls and
helped put her in jail for 18
months by Meg O'Connor,
The Appeal, August 3, 2020: